<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Browsers for Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mackozer.com/2009/05/22/web-browsers-for-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mackozer.com/2009/05/22/web-browsers-for-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description>Apple, Mac OS X, Software Reviews, Poland, Ireland and World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:33:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mackozer.com/2009/05/22/web-browsers-for-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 06:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackozer.com/?p=452#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Alan,
Flash is very crucial for me... thus I can hardly use Opera for daily basis (the latest build of Opera 10 beta has no problems with Flash). 
As for the interface is concerned... man... this is a kind of taste, likes and dislikes. I just don&#039;t like the way Opera looks. For me it is just ugly (yet again, new 10 beta build looks much better). 
So for you is the best, for me it is the worst part.

and I see Opera is kind of app that either people love or completely don&#039;t care about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,<br />
Flash is very crucial for me&#8230; thus I can hardly use Opera for daily basis (the latest build of Opera 10 beta has no problems with Flash).<br />
As for the interface is concerned&#8230; man&#8230; this is a kind of taste, likes and dislikes. I just don&#8217;t like the way Opera looks. For me it is just ugly (yet again, new 10 beta build looks much better).<br />
So for you is the best, for me it is the worst part.</p>
<p>and I see Opera is kind of app that either people love or completely don&#8217;t care about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.mackozer.com/2009/05/22/web-browsers-for-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 06:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackozer.com/?p=452#comment-168</guid>
		<description>I retract that statement, as I did not see its icon at the top, but it is in the listing.

I think your dismissal of Opera is not very fair. While it does have problems with Flash, there are extremely few incompatibilities with websites anymore.  And you do not describe what problem you have with its interface. The interface is by far the best part of Opera: The best keyboard commands (try Cmd+Option+[arrow key] to switch tabs, for example), and mouse gestures, and it didn’t just invent tabs but perfected them. Not to mention it even supports Greasemonkey-style userscripts.  More at http://alanhogan.com/opera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I retract that statement, as I did not see its icon at the top, but it is in the listing.</p>
<p>I think your dismissal of Opera is not very fair. While it does have problems with Flash, there are extremely few incompatibilities with websites anymore.  And you do not describe what problem you have with its interface. The interface is by far the best part of Opera: The best keyboard commands (try Cmd+Option+[arrow key] to switch tabs, for example), and mouse gestures, and it didn’t just invent tabs but perfected them. Not to mention it even supports Greasemonkey-style userscripts.  More at <a href="http://alanhogan.com/opera" rel="nofollow">http://alanhogan.com/opera</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.mackozer.com/2009/05/22/web-browsers-for-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackozer.com/?p=452#comment-164</guid>
		<description>The Mac version of Element Browser currently hosted on Element Software does not reflect the recent developments we have made to the mac version. Please bear with us, it will be uploaded to the site in a Beta 2 form Either during / or ending next month. It features most of that of the Windows version (the windows version is much highly advanced, complete with its own browsing engine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mac version of Element Browser currently hosted on Element Software does not reflect the recent developments we have made to the mac version. Please bear with us, it will be uploaded to the site in a Beta 2 form Either during / or ending next month. It features most of that of the Windows version (the windows version is much highly advanced, complete with its own browsing engine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunrise for Mac OS X - supplement for Web Browsers for Mac OS X, web browsers for Mac OS X, software reviews for Mac OS X &#124; MacKozer</title>
		<link>http://www.mackozer.com/2009/05/22/web-browsers-for-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunrise for Mac OS X - supplement for Web Browsers for Mac OS X, web browsers for Mac OS X, software reviews for Mac OS X &#124; MacKozer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 08:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mackozer.com/?p=452#comment-161</guid>
		<description>[...] on my blog, I  published  a list of 16 web browsers for Mac OS X and now I have just remembered that I forgot &#8230; at least one application of this type - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on my blog, I  published  a list of 16 web browsers for Mac OS X and now I have just remembered that I forgot &#8230; at least one application of this type &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
